What is happening: Collecting. Why it matters: Critical priority with HIGH weather risk. Next action: review ICEYE and approve or compare vendors.
Operator path
Queue
Map
AI
Review
Status
Selected layout: Commander View / Replay state: Mission Created
Collections
Operational satellite collection map
Real Map
Focused AOI: NV056-PAC-221CollectingICEYE
Layer ManagerMap Tools / Hover Intelligence
Data Source Status
Operating ModeLive/open data
Map Styleoperational
AIS FeedMock / Ready
Weather FeedMock / Ready
NASA EONETFALLBACK / Simulated
USGS EventsFALLBACK / Simulated
Orbital PositionSimulated
ADS-B FeedOptional
Vendor APIsSimulated
Clouds 34% / Visibility 18 km / Precip 0.1 mm / Public events 3
Live Data Mode
NV056-PAC-221 / no API keys required
Collecting / Critical / ICEYE
Map Legend
AOI
Satellite pass
Vendor coverage
Weather risk
AIS vessel
Collection footprint
High priority
Completed collection
Rejected option
Operational basemaps use public online tiles. Global offline tile storage is out of Phase I MVP scope; the MVP stores mission data, overlays, scoring results, audit logs, and lightweight metadata only.
AI Recommendation
Primary decision
Recommended Vendor
ICEYE
Confidence 93%
Collection
31m
Delivery
63m
Priority
Critical
Weather
HIGH
Backup
Capella
Weather-independent SAR collection protects timing and confidence while optical collection is degraded. Capella remains staged as the alternate if weather, cost, or tasking latency changes.
Expand Analysis
Mission Score
92 / 100
Estimated Cost
$44.5K
Cost Impact
27% savings
Mission priority carries the greatest weight.
Weather risk is emphasized as the major secondary factor.
Queue conflicts resolved across 3 urgent/weather-risk missions.
Resolution, latency, delivery time, and cost are dynamically balanced.
Show Tradeoffs
1. ICEYE
★★★★★
Immediate SAR collection despite weather.
2. Planet
★★★★☆
Broad-area situational awareness before high-resolution confirmation.
3. Maxar
★★★★★
High-resolution confirmation imagery after cloud gap improves.
Human Decision
Review gate
Operator action
Approve the recommended stack, compare alternates, or modify mission constraints before vendor tasking.
Deterministic model outputs are tied to the enterprise mission queue, selected vendor stack, weather-aware reroutes, latency compression, and audit closure. Current selection: NV056-PAC-221.
Mission fulfillment rate
57%
Avg collection latency reduction
43%
Avg delivery latency reduction
35%
Cost efficiency / savings vs baseline
28%
Weather reroute success rate
75%
Vendor utilization balance
71%
Redundant collection reduction
12 avoided
Recommendation confidence
85%
Human approval rate
86%
Audit completion rate
50%
Expand API Roadmap
Phase I
Simulated vendor APIs
Representative vendor schemas
Notional collection windows
Live weather integration
Public/open data feeds where available
Phase II
Native commercial provider APIs
Vendor authentication
Tasking-window APIs
Pricing/availability feeds
Delivery metadata ingestion
Phase III
Government enterprise tasking environments
MTC-A/X transition pathway
Accredited hosting environment
Operational integration
Phase I demonstrates feasibility through modeling, simulation, representative APIs, and live public data where available. Native commercial provider integration is deferred to Phase II.
